It happened, much to their dismay, just as
he said it would.
The event and everything preceding it rocked
their world. In their desperation, they
had to make it all disappear or at least invalidate it. The best that they could do was to argue that
his friends did it. They came and stole it.
But they also had to deal with the guys who supposedly
allowed his friends to come and steal it.
These guys were supposed to guard it.
And they were not your run of the mill rent-a-cops. They were seasoned professionals.
So they convinced the commanding officers over
the guys to say that they just fell asleep on the job. Then his friends came and stole it. But there was a problem with that story. They either forgot or overlooked or simply
chose to ignore it in their desperation to create a narrative. The problem was that those who fell asleep
would normally be put to death for dereliction of duty.
But, they pressed ahead with the
narrative. We’ll back up your story they
told the commanding officers, as they handed over the bribe. It was designed to create, as we call it
today, plausible deniability.
Plausible
deniability can refer to a lack of evidence proving an allegation and if
the allegation cannot be proved, one can plausibly deny the allegation even though
it may be true.
But, the narrative ended up unraveling as
the evidence mounted. If his friends had
stolen it (the “it” being his body), then how could they explain this account?
The narrative fell apart. Plausible deniability didn’t work. The real story is that it all happened just as he said it would: “This is what is written: The Messiah will suffer and rise from the dead on the third day”. (Luke 24:46)
His body wasn’t stolen! He rose from the dead, just as he said!
Comments
Post a Comment