Skip to main content

A Definitive Neither

“Are you for us or against us?”

“Neither!”

We seem to have this predisposition to want to know whether people are for us or against us.  If they are for us, meaning they are in agreement with what’s important to us, then we can associate with them.  If they are against us, then we can’t associate with them.

In this day and age of polarization, the “for or against us” predisposition seems to be even more prevalent.  Compounding it all, we seem to focus our “for or against us” on single issue items.  Perhaps it’s being for or against abortion or where we fall on gender and sexuality issues or our level of commitment to the environmental or our position on immigration. 

But polarization really understates things as positions have become even more extreme and entrenched.  There doesn’t seem to be any room for common courtesy or looking for common ground or trying to understand the positions that we disagree with.

So if I am asked if I’m for something or against it and I answer ”neither”, it could mean that I don’t have an opinion or that I’m unsure of my position.  But it can also mean that I’m trying to avoid stating a position so that I don’t get caught up in the “for or against us” predicament and either endear myself to others or oppose them.

However, the “neither” answer that started off this post was, in the context of where I read it, spoken with total certainty and there was no hedging in the answer.  In fact, it was  given with full knowledge of all the circumstances surrounding the question.  But, first some background information…

Joshua had been appointed leader of Israel.  They were to go in and take possession of the land.  There would be resistance and battles.  So when Joshua was confronted with a man armed for battle (Joshua 5:13), his question was somewhat normal.  In this case, the answer to “are you for or against us” would normally communicate friend or foe.

So when Joshua asked the question and the answer was “neither” (Josh 5:14), the person wasn’t saying that he was there for Joshua or that he wasn’t there for him.  His answer indicated he was not there to take sides but to take charge as Commander of the Lord’s army.  As Commander, he was there to fulfill God’s plans and purposes.

So what can we learn from this?  It was not for Joshua to claim God’s allegiance for his cause no matter how right it might have been. Rather, it was intended for Joshua to acknowledge God’s claim over him for God’s purposes.

Similar to Joshua, we tend to approach our battles and causes backwards, that is, we to try to get God to be on our side when we really should be submitting to Him and following His plans and purposes.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can't Get No Satisfaction

One of the songs that were popular in my youth was not particularly upbeat or helpful but it probably did express some of the angst of my generation.  It was not one that particularly resonated with me but as I recently read the book of Haggai, it did come to mind, well, at least some of the lyrics did.  It was the Rolling Stones song with the lyrics “I can’t get no satisfaction”.  Take a look at the chorus of that bleak song:   I can't get no satisfaction; I can't get no satisfaction; Gonna try and I try and I try and I try; I can't get no - I can't get no –   Now take a look at Haggai 1:6 – “ You have planted much, but harvested little. You eat, but never have enough. You drink, but never have your fill. You put on clothes, but are not warm. You earn wages, only to put them in a purse with holes in it.” It sure sounds like the people of Judah couldn’t get any satisfaction with the things of life that normally should have brought some type of s...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Horse Of Course

In Biblical times, horses represented military power and strength.  And if you had both horses and chariots, well, that was the ultimate of military powers and wars were often won with them. Yet in seeking to have what would normally be considered insurmountable military strength, there was one factor that was often overlooked.  The Psalmist made it clear what that factor was when he wrote:  “Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the Lord our God.”   (Ps 20:7) While Israel did at times trust in the name of the Lord, there were other times when they tried to trust in horses and chariots to win their battles.  This is what the Lord spoke to Israel through the prophet Isaiah:  “Woe to those who go down to Egypt for help,   who rely on horses, who trust in the multitude of their chariots   and in the great strength of their horsemen, but do not look to the Holy One of Israel, or seek help from the Lord .”  ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stouthearted!

Steve the Stouthearted; it has a nice medieval ring to it, maybe even middle earth overtones.  I noticed that word “stouthearted” recently in Psalm 138, verse 3:   “When I called, you answered me; you made me bold and stouthearted.”   (NIV, 1973) The word stouthearted is used in the Bible to describe individuals who exhibit courage, determination, and resilience, often in the face of adversity or opposition. This characteristic is seen as a virtue, reflecting steadfastness in faith and purpose. The stouthearted are those who remain firm in their convictions and are not easily swayed by fear or doubt (from The Bible Hub website). And yet to be bold and stouthearted for most is not something that just comes naturally, we need the Lord to make us bold and stouthearted.   And, from the verse above, it appears that he does so in response to us calling on him.   So it probably wouldn’t be too much of a stretch to say that those who have been made bold and stouth...
Post a Comment
Read more