Skip to main content

A Definitive Neither

“Are you for us or against us?”

“Neither!”

We seem to have this predisposition to want to know whether people are for us or against us.  If they are for us, meaning they are in agreement with what’s important to us, then we can associate with them.  If they are against us, then we can’t associate with them.

In this day and age of polarization, the “for or against us” predisposition seems to be even more prevalent.  Compounding it all, we seem to focus our “for or against us” on single issue items.  Perhaps it’s being for or against abortion or where we fall on gender and sexuality issues or our level of commitment to the environmental or our position on immigration. 

But polarization really understates things as positions have become even more extreme and entrenched.  There doesn’t seem to be any room for common courtesy or looking for common ground or trying to understand the positions that we disagree with.

So if I am asked if I’m for something or against it and I answer ”neither”, it could mean that I don’t have an opinion or that I’m unsure of my position.  But it can also mean that I’m trying to avoid stating a position so that I don’t get caught up in the “for or against us” predicament and either endear myself to others or oppose them.

However, the “neither” answer that started off this post was, in the context of where I read it, spoken with total certainty and there was no hedging in the answer.  In fact, it was  given with full knowledge of all the circumstances surrounding the question.  But, first some background information…

Joshua had been appointed leader of Israel.  They were to go in and take possession of the land.  There would be resistance and battles.  So when Joshua was confronted with a man armed for battle (Joshua 5:13), his question was somewhat normal.  In this case, the answer to “are you for or against us” would normally communicate friend or foe.

So when Joshua asked the question and the answer was “neither” (Josh 5:14), the person wasn’t saying that he was there for Joshua or that he wasn’t there for him.  His answer indicated he was not there to take sides but to take charge as Commander of the Lord’s army.  As Commander, he was there to fulfill God’s plans and purposes.

So what can we learn from this?  It was not for Joshua to claim God’s allegiance for his cause no matter how right it might have been. Rather, it was intended for Joshua to acknowledge God’s claim over him for God’s purposes.

Similar to Joshua, we tend to approach our battles and causes backwards, that is, we to try to get God to be on our side when we really should be submitting to Him and following His plans and purposes.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Excel Still More!

To excel, according to some of the meanings from a few dictionaries, is to surpass others, do extremely well, outdo, do something better than anyone else. In 1 Thessalonians 4:1, we find the phrase “excel still more”.   It prompts the question:  if we are already doing something better than anyone else, why would we be encouraged to do even more? Perhaps it would be helpful to see the wording that other translations use for “excel still more” to see why we would be encouraged to do so.  Here is a sampling: • abound more and more • to keep doing so more and more • but try even harder • live that way more and more. • that you progress even more. • that you increase more and more in how you ought to walk Maybe it would also be helpful to see some other verses where the word “excel” is used: “Now in Joppa there was a disciple named Tabitha (which when translated means Dorcas); this woman was excelling in acts of kindness and charity which she did habitually.”...
Post a Comment
Read more

New Year Trash or Treasure?

You probably know the old saying:  “One man’s trash is another man’s treasure”.  I am not going to try to prove or disprove it, just look at it from a different angle. Cheryl and I were recently walking on a beach in Florida .  A man was walking along with a bag and was picking up trash and putting it in the bag.  Was he picking up things of value? We also saw a different man walking along the same beach with a metal detector.  He would swing it back and forth and would occasionally stop and dig in the sand.  Was he looking for things of value? Both were intent.  Both were focused.  Both were diligent. I’m guessing that the one picking up trash was not looking for things of value.  I’m also guessing that, by picking up trash, he was valuing the beauty of the beach and didn’t want the trash to mar it.  The one with the metal detector, I’m guessing that he was not looking for metallic items of trash but was looking for...
1 comment
Read more

Value Proposition

Value proposition:  it’s a marketing statement that summarizes why a consumer should buy a product or use a service.  It should clearly and concisely communicate what customers can gain from selecting a particular brand over that of its competitors. In a value proposition, you don’t want your product to be viewed as being worth less than what your competitors offer.   But even worse, in a bit of a quirk of how letters and spaces can fall, if you take out the space between “worth” and “less”, you get “worthless”, which means something of no value.   If that word is used in conjunction with how your product is viewed by customers, it’s a word that will likely kill your brand. In the book of Philippians, the Apostle Paul, in a sense, communicated some value propositions. In chapter three, he starts off with describing the value of some things that many considered as extremely valuable in that day and age.   They had to do with status and achievement in the reli...
Post a Comment
Read more