Skip to main content

It Didn't Stick!

I’m fascinated when words, used as descriptors, are changed in an effort to reduce or remove negative connotations.

Drug addiction is increasing being referred to as substance abuse.

Mental illness is increasingly being referred to as brain health.

I’ve noticed a new change of late.  Homeless is being changed to unhoused.  I suppose homeless does have some negative connotations and the change is meant to help alleviate some of them.

The religious leaders, who could not tolerate Jesus entering their little realm of religious practice, called Jesus a “glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners” (Luke 7:34).  In their minds, these negative descriptors were meant to diminish his stature among the people and dissuade them from following Him.  As such, they had no inclination to ever reduce the negative descriptors that they had assigned to Him.  In fact, the more negative they could make them the better, at according to their way of thinking.

But their tactics didn’t dissuade the people!  Take a look at what Luke records in his Gospel:  “Now the tax collectors and sinners were all drawing near to hear him.  And the Pharisees and the scribes grumbled, saying, “This man receives sinners and eats with them.”  (Luke 15:1-2). 

The religious leaders, who should have been pointing people to God, wouldn’t go near the tax collectors and sinners, the very people who probably needed to be pointed to God the most.  And here Jesus was speaking and teaching and the tax collectors and sinners were drawing near to hear Him!

If that wasn’t bad enough, Jesus, this friend of tax collectors and sinners, was receiving them. 

And if that wasn’t bad enough still, Jesus the “glutton” was eating with them!

But to top it all off, something that drew the tax collectors and sinners (and others) to Jesus was a direct threat to the religious leaders’ status:  “And they were astonished at his teaching, for he taught them as one who had authority, and not as the scribes.”  (Mark 1:22)

While the religious leaders thought they had authority, their teaching said otherwise.  And while they tried to present Jesus as a glutton, drunkard and friend of tax collectors and sinners to prove He had no authority, His teaching said otherwise.

The negative descriptors that the religious leaders tried to stick on Jesus actually became quite the opposite as people voted with their feet and flocked to Him!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Can't Get No Satisfaction

One of the songs that were popular in my youth was not particularly upbeat or helpful but it probably did express some of the angst of my generation.  It was not one that particularly resonated with me but as I recently read the book of Haggai, it did come to mind, well, at least some of the lyrics did.  It was the Rolling Stones song with the lyrics “I can’t get no satisfaction”.  Take a look at the chorus of that bleak song:   I can't get no satisfaction; I can't get no satisfaction; Gonna try and I try and I try and I try; I can't get no - I can't get no –   Now take a look at Haggai 1:6 – “ You have planted much, but harvested little. You eat, but never have enough. You drink, but never have your fill. You put on clothes, but are not warm. You earn wages, only to put them in a purse with holes in it.” It sure sounds like the people of Judah couldn’t get any satisfaction with the things of life that normally should have brought some type of s...

A Horse Of Course

In Biblical times, horses represented military power and strength.  And if you had both horses and chariots, well, that was the ultimate of military powers and wars were often won with them. Yet in seeking to have what would normally be considered insurmountable military strength, there was one factor that was often overlooked.  The Psalmist made it clear what that factor was when he wrote:  “Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the Lord our God.”   (Ps 20:7) While Israel did at times trust in the name of the Lord, there were other times when they tried to trust in horses and chariots to win their battles.  This is what the Lord spoke to Israel through the prophet Isaiah:  “Woe to those who go down to Egypt for help,   who rely on horses, who trust in the multitude of their chariots   and in the great strength of their horsemen, but do not look to the Holy One of Israel, or seek help from the Lord .”  ...

Stouthearted!

Steve the Stouthearted; it has a nice medieval ring to it, maybe even middle earth overtones.  I noticed that word “stouthearted” recently in Psalm 138, verse 3:   “When I called, you answered me; you made me bold and stouthearted.”   (NIV, 1973) The word stouthearted is used in the Bible to describe individuals who exhibit courage, determination, and resilience, often in the face of adversity or opposition. This characteristic is seen as a virtue, reflecting steadfastness in faith and purpose. The stouthearted are those who remain firm in their convictions and are not easily swayed by fear or doubt (from The Bible Hub website). And yet to be bold and stouthearted for most is not something that just comes naturally, we need the Lord to make us bold and stouthearted.   And, from the verse above, it appears that he does so in response to us calling on him.   So it probably wouldn’t be too much of a stretch to say that those who have been made bold and stouth...